Currently, there is not a law that requires radio stations
to pay royalties to
performing artists (performers) or record label companies (labels). However, a
proposed Fair
Play Fair Pay Act is underway to seek authorization to require [terrestrial] radio stations [not internet radio stations] to pay royalties to performers and labels. As of now,
radio stations are required by law to pay royalties to only songwriters and/or
publishers. The controversy in this issue is whether consideration should even
be given to pay performers and label companies.
I believe it would only
be fair to do so. If performers/labels receive royalties for taped and live
performances, television broadcastings, and/or social media forums, then they
should also be compensated for [terrestrial] radio play as well.
The fact that radio stations have not been required to pay performers and labels pinpoint another loophole in intellectual
property reformation. Because of the rapid evolution of technology, many laws
that should regulate intellectual property have not been established yet. With that being said, I
see radio stations, both terrestrial and internet radio, as being similar in
nature. I see both as similiar to companies like Pandora,
Spotify, Songza, etc. Those companies
license songs and are required to pay royalties to all the right holders
including performers and labels. Likewise, [terrestrial] radio stations should
be required to do so too.
According to an article by the Future
of Music Coalition, this issue demonstrates a high lack of “…reciprocal
rights.” How is it that radio stations have been able to get away with this? I
would contribute such absence of regulation to the rapid evolution of intellectual
property, but this issue should have been regulated since “years ago.”
Additionally, it is interesting that when it was determined that internet radio stations were required to pay royalties to performers and labels, it should have also been determined, at that time, for terrestrial stations as well. I look forward to the verdict of the court’s decision to the proposed Fair Play Fair Pay Act and I will provide a follow up blog on that case.
Additionally, it is interesting that when it was determined that internet radio stations were required to pay royalties to performers and labels, it should have also been determined, at that time, for terrestrial stations as well. I look forward to the verdict of the court’s decision to the proposed Fair Play Fair Pay Act and I will provide a follow up blog on that case.
Margery,
ReplyDeleteI completely agree with your opinion regarding the Fair Play Fair Pay Act and believe that performers and record labels should be paid for radio plays as well. I've been following this legislation push for some time now, mostly through the Grammys On The Hill organization, and think it's a step in the right direction of reforming U.S. copyright law. The United States is one of the few nations who do not require these royalties, and their implementation is long overdue, as performers and labels have essentially been robbed from millions of dollars in revenue that can sustain artists' careers. I sure hope this new bill passes and is signed into law soon.